Designing Appointment Scheduling for Terminals: From Data Chaos to Decision Intelligence

Three years ago, what is now a global appointment and payment platform was just an idea—a sketch on a whiteboard, a late-night call across time zones, a messy prototype full of promise.

Appointment scheduling may not sound glamorous, but for terminal operators and dispatchers, it’s mission-critical. When containers don’t move on time, costs ripple through the supply chain. Missed appointments mean trucks idling, ships delayed, and teams scrambling to reconcile conflicting data. And it’s not because operators lack skill. It’s because their tools often don’t guide decisions clearly enough.

That’s the design gap I set out to close.

The Challenge

Complex systems overwhelm even the best operators. Dispatchers juggle multiple containers, carriers, and terminals simultaneously, often with incomplete or conflicting data. The stakes are high: one missed slot can mean cascading delays across an entire logistics chain.

The initial platform concept was simple: reorganize appointment data into a grid. On paper, this improved visibility. In practice, it failed to address the real problem—dispatchers still faced cognitive overload, alert fatigue, and friction in managing multi-container, multi-terminal workflows.

Lesson one: better data layout ≠ better decision-making.

The Approach

Instead of doubling down on data presentation, I took a step back. With dispatchers, truckers, and ops teams in the room, we mapped real workflows end-to-end.

  • We identified where decision bottlenecks lived.

  • We uncovered friction points where users lost critical time—searching for container info, reconciling terminal rules, or juggling alerts.

  • And we validated a crucial insight: faster scheduling wasn’t about more data, it was about surfacing the right data at the right time.

These co-creation workshops aligned product, engineering, and ops around one clear design goal: support dispatchers under pressure, not just re-skin the interface.

The Design

The solution wasn’t a prettier grid. It was a smarter workflow.

  • Contextual scheduling. We surfaced terminal, container, and time context upfront, reducing the need to cross-check multiple screens.

  • Workflow-centered booking. Dispatchers could now book multiple containers in a single action—pick-up, drop-off, combined flows.

  • Visual indicators. Color coding, cut-off times, and availability alerts reduced last-minute surprises and missed slots.

  • Dispatcher-first views. A simplified, terminal-sorted overview delivered the clarity they needed most: where to act, when to act, and how to prioritize.

  • Seamless integration. Instead of forcing new billing flows, we plugged into existing third-party payment systems to reduce noise and rollout friction.

This shift transformed the platform from a static data repository into an actionable scheduling intelligence tool.

The Impact

Today, the platform is live with ICTSI—the world’s largest independent terminal operator—reshaping how global terminals manage appointments and payments.

For dispatchers, this means:

  • Reduced stress and fewer errors.

  • Shorter scheduling times.

  • Clearer, calmer decision-making in time-critical environments.

For operators, it means fewer delays, lower costs, and smoother coordination across shippers, carriers, and logistics providers.

And for me, it’s a reminder of why I love designing for complex, high-stakes workflows: because when you reduce cognitive load and guide decisions clearly, you don’t just make tools more usable—you change how entire systems run.

Looking Back

I remember the midnight calls, the logic-mapping sessions, the debates over which alerts mattered most. I remember handing prototypes across time zones, iterating until the pieces clicked. And then I moved on—more projects, bigger challenges.

But design leadership is about planting seeds. Sometimes they bloom years later, becoming the platforms that reshape industries. That’s what this project became.

And maybe what I’m building now will do even more.

Key takeaway: In technical domains, great UX isn’t about pixels—it’s about reducing cognitive load, guiding safe and efficient decisions, and making every interaction purposeful.

Previous
Previous

From Chatbot to Conversation: Designing Ally’s First Interaction

Next
Next

Entry 03